92C.Computation
of arm’s length price.
(1) The arm’s
length price in relation to an international transaction shall be determined by
any of the following methods, being the most appropriate method, having regard
to the nature of transaction or class of transaction or class of associated
persons or functions performed by such persons or such other relevant factors
as the Board may prescribe, namely:-
(a) comparable uncontrolled price method;
(b) resale price method;
(c) cost plus method;
(d) profit split method;
(e) transactional net margin method;
(f) such other method as may be prescribed by the Board.
(2) The most
appropriate method referred to in sub-section (1) shall be applied, for
determination of arm’s length price, in the manner as may be prescribed:
Provided that where more
than one price is determined by the most appropriate method, the arm’s length price
shall be taken to be the arithmetical mean of such prices, or, at the option of the
assessee, a price which may vary from the arithmetical mean by an amount not
exceeding five per cent of such arithmetical mean.
(3) Where
during the course of any proceeding for the assessment of income, the Assessing
Officer is, on the basis of material or information or document in his
possession, of the opinion that-
(a) the price
charged or paid in an international transaction has not been determined in
accordance with sub-sections (1) and (2); or
(b) any
information and document relating to an international transaction have not been
kept and maintained by the assessee in accordance with the provisions contained
in sub-section (1) of section 92D and the rules made in this behalf; or
(c) the
information or data used in computation of the arm’s length price is not
reliable or correct; or
(d) the
assessee has failed to furnish, within the specified time, any information or
document which he was required to furnish by a notice issued under sub-section
(3) of section 92D, the Assessing Officer may proceed to determine the arm’s
length price in relation to the said international transaction in accordance
with sub-sections (1) and (2), on the basis of such material or information or
document available with him:
Provided that
an opportunity shall be given by the Assessing Officer by serving a notice
calling upon the assessee to show cause, on a date and time to be specified in
the notice, why the arm’s length price should not be so determined on the basis
of material or information or document in the possession of the Assessing
Officer.
(4) Where an
arm’s length price is determined by the Assessing Officer under sub-section
(3), the Assessing Officer may compute the total income of the assessee having
regard to the arm’s length price so determined:
Provided that
no deduction under section 10A or section 10B or under Chapter VI-A shall be
allowed in respect of the amount of income by which the total income of the
assessee is enhanced after computation of income under this sub-section.
Provided
further that where the total income of an associated enterprise is computed
under this sub-section on determination of the arm’s length price paid to
another associated enterprise from which ax has been deducted or deductible under the provisions
of Chapter XVIIB, the income of the other associated enterprise shall not be
recomputed by reason of such determination of arm’s length price in the case of
the first mentioned enterprise.